You are reading
Budget, Economy

I have previously written on a number of themes that are in play in the current debate to avoid sequester from taking place.  At the risk of boring some by repeating them, this debate boils down to one fundamental issue that the country has to decide:  whether the private sector provides for jobs and economic growth or the government is a better way to achieve the same end.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi

President Obama and his party tend to agree with the statement made by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi that spending cuts would hurt economic growth.  Stated another way, most Democrats subscribe to an economic model which says that government spending is a critical element to economic strength.  The problem with this approach is that it assumes government is like a business.  It takes as fact that government creates revenue that is used to employ people and produce a product that generates further revenue in an effort to self-sustain or even grow.  The problem is, government doesn’t work this way.  It’s only way to generate revenue is to take it, through taxes, from others.  It cannot self-sustain, and in fact, makes it much harder for others to self-sustain by taking valuable resources from people who can use them more effectively.

Republicans, conservative ones anyway, firmly believe that economic growth and job creation takes place in the private sector without government intervention.  Placing money in the hands of people who know how to use it to build businesses and create even more revenue in that type of self-sustaining work that creates jobs and grows the economy is the answer.  We are better off as a country by keeping government spending down so that it needs less revenue and, therefore, takes less from the productive private sector.

Those on the right and those on the left also disagree on another fundamental and related principal.  People left of center tend to think that the amount of pie is fixed and we must spread it around as a matter of “fairness” so that everyone gets a piece .  Those on the right tend to think the pie can be made bigger and bigger so that everyone can have a piece and a larger one at that.

The sequester debate is really about whether we continue to feed the beast in a way that fits the Democrat government-centric approach to economics or scale it back to the more traditionally American approach adopted by those of us on the right.

Navy SEALs in action.  Fund critical governmental functions like this, let the rest suffer their fate in sequester

Navy SEALs in action. Fund critical governmental functions like this, let the rest suffer their fate in sequester

The way to win the debate is to allow sequester to happen, in part.  The Republican House should pass legislation in small pieces to pay for the necessary parts of the government like defense spending.  Send the bills to the Senate and the President and let them say no if they choose.  As for the rest, let the sequester take effect. 

Calling for the parties to come together will once again fall on deaf ears.  What’s more, this alternative approach allows Republicans to flip the debate and, if Democrats won’t pass the legislation on the parts Republicans send over to the Senate, claim Democrats are the ones unwilling to be reasonable.  After all, everyone can agree that our military should remain strong and our soldiers, sailors, and Marines paid.  Other elements of the budget fit into similar categories and could be approached the same way.

If Democrats won’t agree on a resolution to those spending levels, then they are the ones holding things hostage to serve their own ideological ends of growing the welfare state.  At that point, they are exposed.


About Josh Quinter

I am a politcally active private practice attorney in Suburban Philadelphia.


3 thoughts on “

  1. I am so thrilled I found your blog page. I really found you by error while I was
    browsing on Askjeeve for something else. Anyways I
    am here now and would just like to say thanks for a fantastic post and a all round enjoyable blog (I also love the theme/design). I don’t have time to read
    through it all at the moment, but I have book-marked it and also added your RSS feeds. Please
    do keep up the great work.

    Posted by Javier | March 23, 2013, 9:52 pm
  2. Awesome article.

    Posted by Barney | March 24, 2013, 10:07 pm
  3. This blog post couldn’t be written any better! Going through this post reminds me of my previous roommate! He kept preaching about this. I will send this article to him. Fairly certain he’s going to have a great read. Thanks for sharing!

    Posted by Josh | April 6, 2013, 3:57 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Armstrong Walks On The Moon

44th Anniversary of Neil Armstrong's Moon WalkJuly 20th, 2013
Another Occasion On Which America Lead The Way

My Twitter Feed

%d bloggers like this: